<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: On the gospel&#8230;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://seeingclearly.wordpress.com/2007/07/14/on-the-gospel/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://seeingclearly.wordpress.com/2007/07/14/on-the-gospel/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 21:36:17 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: clearly</title>
		<link>http://seeingclearly.wordpress.com/2007/07/14/on-the-gospel/#comment-356</link>
		<dc:creator>clearly</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Jul 2007 22:33:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seeingclearly.wordpress.com/2007/07/14/on-the-gospel/#comment-356</guid>
		<description>Also, I don&#039;t think that social aid is part of the gospel. I think it validates it (or at least miracles did for Christ) and I think that good works, in general, flow from the gospel. I don&#039;t think we will agree on this_</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Also, I don&#8217;t think that social aid is part of the gospel. I think it validates it (or at least miracles did for Christ) and I think that good works, in general, flow from the gospel. I don&#8217;t think we will agree on this_</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: clearly</title>
		<link>http://seeingclearly.wordpress.com/2007/07/14/on-the-gospel/#comment-355</link>
		<dc:creator>clearly</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Jul 2007 22:31:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seeingclearly.wordpress.com/2007/07/14/on-the-gospel/#comment-355</guid>
		<description>Hey Phil, 

It would be hard to disagree with most of what you said --- I don&#039;t really see what you said as being in opposition to what I posted. 

We probably have different ideas of the kingdom to some extent, but I don&#039;t believe that there can be a kingdom without a cross (Col. 1:13-14) --- the cross comes before the kingdodm --- Christ&#039;s suffering precedes his glorification.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Phil, </p>
<p>It would be hard to disagree with most of what you said &#8212; I don&#8217;t really see what you said as being in opposition to what I posted. </p>
<p>We probably have different ideas of the kingdom to some extent, but I don&#8217;t believe that there can be a kingdom without a cross (Col. 1:13-14) &#8212; the cross comes before the kingdodm &#8212; Christ&#8217;s suffering precedes his glorification.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: phil</title>
		<link>http://seeingclearly.wordpress.com/2007/07/14/on-the-gospel/#comment-354</link>
		<dc:creator>phil</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Jul 2007 19:58:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seeingclearly.wordpress.com/2007/07/14/on-the-gospel/#comment-354</guid>
		<description>Hey Dave,
I understand what you&#039;re getting at, but I kind of think you&#039;re reacting against a straw man to some extent.  I can&#039;t say I&#039;ve really heard anyone say that the gospel is &quot;merely handing out meals at a soup kitchen or merely providing shelter for the homeless and afflicted..etc&quot;  I have heard people say or imply that those things are part of the gospel, but not the whole.

I would say that both proclamation and demonstration need to be part of a presentation of the Gospel.  If it just proclamation, it is just words.  If it is just demonstration, it becomes a social project with no real power behind it.  I would also say that demonstration could include things you don&#039;t list there like healings or other miracles.  It seems like demonstration is one thing that the Holy Spirit could contextualize (I know that word has all sorts of baggage, but I&#039;m not meaning it in a postmodern sense) how this happens.

I think we would do well to focus on the Gospel by saying it how Jesus said it, &quot;the Kingdom of God is at hand&quot;.  Jesus&#039; death and resurrection opened the gates to the Kingdom for all.  Certainly the message of the cross still contains an element of offense, and I think it always will.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Dave,<br />
I understand what you&#8217;re getting at, but I kind of think you&#8217;re reacting against a straw man to some extent.  I can&#8217;t say I&#8217;ve really heard anyone say that the gospel is &#8220;merely handing out meals at a soup kitchen or merely providing shelter for the homeless and afflicted..etc&#8221;  I have heard people say or imply that those things are part of the gospel, but not the whole.</p>
<p>I would say that both proclamation and demonstration need to be part of a presentation of the Gospel.  If it just proclamation, it is just words.  If it is just demonstration, it becomes a social project with no real power behind it.  I would also say that demonstration could include things you don&#8217;t list there like healings or other miracles.  It seems like demonstration is one thing that the Holy Spirit could contextualize (I know that word has all sorts of baggage, but I&#8217;m not meaning it in a postmodern sense) how this happens.</p>
<p>I think we would do well to focus on the Gospel by saying it how Jesus said it, &#8220;the Kingdom of God is at hand&#8221;.  Jesus&#8217; death and resurrection opened the gates to the Kingdom for all.  Certainly the message of the cross still contains an element of offense, and I think it always will.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
